I am chiefly interested in the kind of theatre that embraces change and is a reminder of our mortality; theatre that does not confirm power, but rather admits fragility, acknowledges failure, that recognizes tragedy and is disrespectful enough to create comedy. That’s the theatre that I keep imagining and that I write for. I write for it in order to create it. A playwright must do this; the play that he or she writes is always a new proposal for the theatre. It is an imaginative act that suggests something beyond the play itself and contains the possibility for new forms of theatre. It does this because the content of a play demands the clearest expression possible. This clarity is necessary because of the nature of the theatre event itself: it is ephemeral. It happens before our eyes and then it is gone. The performance of a play must present its comedy, its tragedy, its life, in the time during which it is created on stage in front of the audience. It can do nothing else. Each time it does this, it is particular, it is unique; in this it is theatre created anew, and within that fact lies the possibility of a new kind of theatre.Read the rest here.
Thursday, November 23, 2006
Something to Inspire
Theatre Notes offers Daniel Keene's 2006 Rex Cramphorn Memorial Lecture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Alison Croggon and Daniel Keene are amazing.
I just love everything they do.
That essay moved me so much.
I've been thinking about this essay constantly and reading it over and over. It's good to know that there are artists out there who feel the way I do about making theatre.
I love the sense of possibility it left me with. The idea that we create theatre anew with each new work we devise or write. That is how I experience it. I have become so tired of hearing artists hide behind the "oh, there are only seven stories in the whole world to tell-it's all been done etc." pose. We're never going to see anything new or astonishing that way.
totally.
i feel the same way.
Post a Comment