What reason have we Americans to think our own society will necessarily escape the world-wide drift toward the totalitarian organization of men and institutions?
This may seem, at the moment, like a fantastic theory. Yet history demonstrates that personal liberty is a rare and precious thing, that all societies tend toward the absolute until attack from without or collapse from within breaks up the social machine and makes freedom and innovation possible again. Technology adds a new dimension to the process by providing modern despots with instruments far more efficient than any available to their classical counterparts. Surely it is no accident that the most thorough of tyrannies appeared in Europe's most thoroughly scientific and industrialized nation. If we allow our own country to become as densely populated, overdeveloped and technically unified as modern Germany we may face a similar fate.
The value of wilderness, on the other hand, as a base for resistance to centralized domination is demonstrated by recent history. In Budapest and Santo Domingo, for example, popular revolts were easily and quickly crushed because an urbanized environment give the advantage to the power with the technological equipment. But in Cuba, Algeria and Vietnam the revolutionaries, operating in mountain, desert and jungle hinterlands with the active or tacit support of a thinly dispersed population, have been able to overcome or at least fight to a draw official establishment forces equipped with all the terrible weapons of twentieth century militarism. Rural insurrections can then be suppressed only by bombing and burning villages and countrysides so thoroughly that the mass of the population is forced to take refuge in the cities, where the people are policed and if necessary starved into submission. The city, which should be the symbol and center of civilization, can also be made to function as a concentration camp. This is one of the significant discoveries of contemporary political science.
How does this theory apply to the present and future of the famous United States of North America? Suppose we were planning to impose a dictatorial regime upon the American people- the following preparations would be essential:Idle speculation, feeble and hopeless protest. It was all foreseen nearly half a century ago by the most cold-eyed of our national poets, on California's shore, at the end of the open road. Shine perishing republic.
- Concentrate the populace in megalopolitan masses, so that they can be kept under close surveillance and where, in the case of trouble, they can be bombed, burned, gassed or machine-gunned with a minimum of expense and waste.
- Mechanize agriculture to the highest degree of refinement, thus forcing most of the scattered farm and ranching populations into the cities. Such a policy is desirable because farmers, woodsman, cowboys, Indians, fisherman, and other relatively self-sufficient types are difficult to manage unless displaced from their natural environment.
- Restrict the possession of firearms to the police and the regular military organizations.
- Encourage or at least fail to discourage population growth. Large masses of people are more easily manipulated and dominated than scattered individuals.
- Continue military conscription. Nothing excels military training for creating in young men an attitude of prompt, cheerful obedience to officially constituted authority.
- Divert attention from deep conflicts within the society by engaging in foreign wars; make support of these wars a test of loyalty thereby exposing and isolating potential opposition to the new order.
- Overlay the nation with a finely reticulated network of communications, airlines and interstate autobahns.
- Raze the wilderness. Dam the rivers, flood the canyons, drain the swamps, log the forests, stripe mine the hills, bulldoze the mountains, irrigate deserts and improve national parking lots.
Edward Abbey, 1968.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Spreading Joy and Hope
I don't necessarily agree with everything Abbey details in this excerpt, but I have to admit he was prescient about a number of things.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hey, I love "ghost light"...added it to my "Fellow Travelers" list on my blog. We share common sources of inspiration as well as profession. And, oddly enough, I used to work for Abbey's agent and got a couple chances to talk to "Cactus Ed" before he shuffled off to that desert shack over the far hill.
Best,
Steve Patterson
http://splattworks.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment