Besides having cultivated taste, feeling, and a talent for clear observation of people:
- The critic should know the greater part of the classic and contemporary drama as written and played. Added to this, he must be conversant with general literature: novels, poetry, essays of wide scope.
- He should know the history of the theater from its origin to the present.
- He should have a long and broad play-going experience - of native and foreign productions.
- He should possess an interest in and a familiarity with the arts: painting, music, architecture, and the dance.
- He should have worked in the theater in some capacity (apart from criticism).
- He should know the history of his country and world history: the social thinking of the past and present.
- He should have something like a philosophy, an attitude toward life.
- He should write lucidly and, if possible, gracefully.
- He should respect his readers by upholding high standards and encourage his readers to cultivate the same.
- He should be aware of his prejudices and blind spots.
- He should err of the side of generosity rather than display an opposite zeal.
- He should seek to enlighten rather than to carp or puff.
1 comment:
Wow, this is the best list of traits I've seen so far. From Clurman, no less. Good find.
Post a Comment